<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why I&#8217;m Still Undecided</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.c4chaos.com/2008/01/why-im-still-undecided/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.c4chaos.com/2008/01/why-im-still-undecided/</link>
	<description>(hyper)streaming with passion and compassion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 00:43:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: I Had a Dream: John McCain Picked a Woman as VP Running Mate &#60; ~C4Chaos</title>
		<link>http://www.c4chaos.com/2008/01/why-im-still-undecided/comment-page-1/#comment-3045</link>
		<dc:creator>I Had a Dream: John McCain Picked a Woman as VP Running Mate &#60; ~C4Chaos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 00:01:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c4chaos.com/2008/01/why-im-still-undecided/#comment-3045</guid>
		<description>[...] also a grave disrespect for Hillary and what she stands for. I say this as someone who had been torn between Obama and Hillary during the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] also a grave disrespect for Hillary and what she stands for. I say this as someone who had been torn between Obama and Hillary during the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bob</title>
		<link>http://www.c4chaos.com/2008/01/why-im-still-undecided/comment-page-1/#comment-632</link>
		<dc:creator>bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 13:04:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c4chaos.com/2008/01/why-im-still-undecided/#comment-632</guid>
		<description>I would vote for Bush again, if only he could run.

Why?

Well I think the culture of the US is some kind of hideous drug, and the addict has yet to hit bottom.

Another 4 years of it, I say.

To that end, the best Republican candidate would be Bill Clinton, definitely, or, his wife, I guess.

I still think that having two names for the same political party is unnecessary.  But whatever.

Oh, and by the way, your review of Dawkins was interesting.  But that does nothing to change the fact that his whole narrative is a relentless snore.


None of this matters, luckily, since the world is going to end in 4 years anyway.  Good riddance to bad rubbish!

For you naysayers who will laugh your way into 2013, claiming that nothing changed, and the world is still going-

NEWSFLASH ASSHOLES:  anything after 2012 that even remotely resembles the current situation will merely be the matrix-like VR created by the self-transforming machine elves from the &quot;future&quot; that You special-ordered fresh from the factory.

Have fun kids.

As for me, I have placed a different order.

You superstitious people probably still believe in childish fairytales like the existence of &quot;atoms&quot; and  &quot;planets&quot; and &quot;space&quot;, too.  How medieval.

Have you ever actually Seen any of these thing with your own eyes??

Bwa ha Haaa Haaaaa!


Now There`s a narrative!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would vote for Bush again, if only he could run.</p>
<p>Why?</p>
<p>Well I think the culture of the US is some kind of hideous drug, and the addict has yet to hit bottom.</p>
<p>Another 4 years of it, I say.</p>
<p>To that end, the best Republican candidate would be Bill Clinton, definitely, or, his wife, I guess.</p>
<p>I still think that having two names for the same political party is unnecessary.  But whatever.</p>
<p>Oh, and by the way, your review of Dawkins was interesting.  But that does nothing to change the fact that his whole narrative is a relentless snore.</p>
<p>None of this matters, luckily, since the world is going to end in 4 years anyway.  Good riddance to bad rubbish!</p>
<p>For you naysayers who will laugh your way into 2013, claiming that nothing changed, and the world is still going-</p>
<p>NEWSFLASH ASSHOLES:  anything after 2012 that even remotely resembles the current situation will merely be the matrix-like VR created by the self-transforming machine elves from the &#8220;future&#8221; that You special-ordered fresh from the factory.</p>
<p>Have fun kids.</p>
<p>As for me, I have placed a different order.</p>
<p>You superstitious people probably still believe in childish fairytales like the existence of &#8220;atoms&#8221; and  &#8220;planets&#8221; and &#8220;space&#8221;, too.  How medieval.</p>
<p>Have you ever actually Seen any of these thing with your own eyes??</p>
<p>Bwa ha Haaa Haaaaa!</p>
<p>Now There`s a narrative!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob D.</title>
		<link>http://www.c4chaos.com/2008/01/why-im-still-undecided/comment-page-1/#comment-631</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob D.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 04:08:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c4chaos.com/2008/01/why-im-still-undecided/#comment-631</guid>
		<description>Clinton-Obama?

I think I&#039;d prefer Obama-Clinton, at this point anyway.

Maybe Edwards can be a cabinet member, along with Kucinich.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clinton-Obama?</p>
<p>I think I&#8217;d prefer Obama-Clinton, at this point anyway.</p>
<p>Maybe Edwards can be a cabinet member, along with Kucinich.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ~C4Chaos</title>
		<link>http://www.c4chaos.com/2008/01/why-im-still-undecided/comment-page-1/#comment-630</link>
		<dc:creator>~C4Chaos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 15:31:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c4chaos.com/2008/01/why-im-still-undecided/#comment-630</guid>
		<description>good point on the polarizing issue. so how about a Clinton-Obama ticket? would that do it for you? :)

~C
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>good point on the polarizing issue. so how about a Clinton-Obama ticket? would that do it for you? <img src='http://www.c4chaos.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>~C</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob D.</title>
		<link>http://www.c4chaos.com/2008/01/why-im-still-undecided/comment-page-1/#comment-629</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob D.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 14:37:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c4chaos.com/2008/01/why-im-still-undecided/#comment-629</guid>
		<description>C-

Like you, I&#039;m still undecided, except that I will support a democrat in November.  I like the &quot;idea&quot; of Obama being president.  He&#039;s charismatic, has an inspiring, hopeful message, and his background makes him a perfect symbol for &quot;unity in diversity.&quot;  However, his speeches tend to be full of inspiration but relatively empty in regards to specific issues and plans.

Based on the speeches, I like Edwards best.  He&#039;s very clear about where he stands and what he plans to do as president.

I don&#039;t know about Clinton.  She is very strong in the debates and knows how to work a crowd.  But her campaign has been punctuated with slimy little incidents (push polling in Iowa; staffers making slanderous comments, then being fired) that give me pause.  Also, she is the most polarizing of the democratic candidates, in that -- like Bush -- people tend to love her or hate her.  With the division of red states and blue states being what it is, I don&#039;t like the idea of another polarizing persona in the White House.

On the Republican side, aside from McCain, the candidates seem very weak.  I was embarrassed for the lot of them when I watched the CNN/YouTube debates.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cuWUdUDUIDQ&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;This Huckabee parody&lt;/a&gt; says it all.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>C-</p>
<p>Like you, I&#8217;m still undecided, except that I will support a democrat in November.  I like the &#8220;idea&#8221; of Obama being president.  He&#8217;s charismatic, has an inspiring, hopeful message, and his background makes him a perfect symbol for &#8220;unity in diversity.&#8221;  However, his speeches tend to be full of inspiration but relatively empty in regards to specific issues and plans.</p>
<p>Based on the speeches, I like Edwards best.  He&#8217;s very clear about where he stands and what he plans to do as president.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know about Clinton.  She is very strong in the debates and knows how to work a crowd.  But her campaign has been punctuated with slimy little incidents (push polling in Iowa; staffers making slanderous comments, then being fired) that give me pause.  Also, she is the most polarizing of the democratic candidates, in that &#8212; like Bush &#8212; people tend to love her or hate her.  With the division of red states and blue states being what it is, I don&#8217;t like the idea of another polarizing persona in the White House.</p>
<p>On the Republican side, aside from McCain, the candidates seem very weak.  I was embarrassed for the lot of them when I watched the CNN/YouTube debates.  <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cuWUdUDUIDQ" rel="nofollow">This Huckabee parody</a> says it all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

